Showing posts with label FL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FL. Show all posts

Jul 6, 2011

Florida Libertarians Call for Arrest of TSA Agents

A press release sent to TPID via email:
PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA - In a strongly-worded email sent today to all of Florida's 67 county sheriffs, the Libertarian Party of Florida demanded the arrest of TSA agents for violations of the U.S. and Florida Constitutions, and accused TSA agents of committing sexual battery. The letter reads as follows: 
Dear Sheriff,

On this day in 1776, our forebears founded this Nation by declaring their independence from an oppressive government. This beautiful and timeless document expressed the self-evident truth that all people have certain inalienable rights, upon which no government can infringe. They asserted that governments are formed among men to secure these rights, not to impede or restrict them.

The Libertarian Party of Florida is reaching out to you, and to all of Florida's 67 Constitutional Sheriffs. We, The People of the State of Florida must turn to you as our last line of defense against a federal government that is usurping authority and ignoring the rule of law.

I am referring specifically to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and their egregious violations of the United States Constitution, as well as the Florida Constitution and state law.

Every single day, TSA employees conduct electronic and bodily searches upon tens of thousands of Florida citizens and visitors at airports, and more recently at bus terminals, rail stations, and highways. They are searching the persons and seizing the effects of travelers without warrant or probable cause. Specifically, they are in blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reads as follows:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

These TSA agents are also in clear violation of Article One, Section 12 of the Florida Constitution, which reads as follows:

"Searches and seizures.— The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and against the unreasonable interception of private communications by any means, shall not be violated. No warrant shall be issued except upon probable cause, supported by affidavit, particularly describing the place or places to be searched, the person or persons, thing or things to be seized, the communication to be intercepted, and the nature of evidence to be obtained."

In addition, one of the methods by which the TSA agents conduct these searches, referred to as the "Enhanced Pat Down," is clearly within the definition of felony sexual battery, as codified in Florida Statute 794.011.

I would like to point out that this statute clearly defines that it is a first degree felony when sexual battery is committed by a law enforcement agent in paragraph 4(g), which reads:

"When the offender is a law enforcement officer, correctional officer, or correctional probation officer as defined by s. 943.10(1), (2), (3), (6), (7), (8), or (9), who is certified under the provisions of s. 943.1395 or is an elected official exempt from such certification by virtue of s. 943.253, or any other person in a position of control or authority in a probation, community control, controlled release, detention, custodial, or similar setting, and such officer, official, or person is acting in such a manner as to lead the victim to reasonably believe that the offender is in a position of control or authority as an agent or employee of government."

As Sheriff, you have the absolute duty to enforce the law uniformly and without prejudice. You are, at best, engaged in selective enforcement by choosing to further ignore these flagrant violations of federal and state law. At worst, you are complicit.

If you have TSA agents within your county that are violating the law, then you must act. Warn the TSA agents that they are subject to arrest if they continue to violate the law. Should they continue, then you must begin making arrests.

We urge you to remember the oath you took to support, protect and defend the Constitution of both the State of Florida and the United States of America. On behalf of all Floridians, the Libertarian Party of Florida calls on you to do exactly that.

We turn to you, our Constitutional Sheriffs, to enforce the law in accordance with your sworn duty.

Sincerely,
Adrian Wyllie, Chairman
Libertarian Party of Florida

Jun 13, 2011

Libertarian Party of Florida on the Trouble with Libertarians

From the LP Florida:
There is a paradigm shift in this country happening, it’s not Republican/Democrat or Left/Right, or Conservative/Liberal. The people are realizing that there is now a war between those who love liberty and all it entails and statists who want to control everything. The Libertarian Party should take advantage of this paradigm shift, but as our 40 year history has shown, we once again we shoot ourselves in the foot. We have again furthered our image of Amoral Atheistic Anarchists. This unfortunately accurate combination of descriptors will insure that the American people will only rarely elect Libertarian candidates. Ron Paul, arguably the most successful candidate wearing the libertarian moniker, is not a member of the Libertarian Party. Because he has realized that to win elections and have a positive affect for liberty for all Americans, he had to abandon the LP. Americans will not elect Amoral Atheistic Anarchists . . .

May 17, 2011

FL: Libertarian Party Chair Protests Real ID Act

From the Libertarian Party of Florida:
Libertarian Party of Florida Chairman Adrian Wyllie will surrender his driver’s license in protest of Florida’s implementation of the Real ID Act at noon on Tuesday, May 17 at the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles office at 29399 Hwy 19 North in Clearwater (map). He has invited the public to witness the protest, and urges others to do the same.

Under the Real ID Act, state law requires that all applicants for a driver’s license or identification card submit an array of personal information, including an original birth certificate, social security card, marriage license(s), utility bills, and other documents. These documents are then scanned into an interstate database managed by the Department of Homeland security . . .

Apr 23, 2011

FL: Election Law Would Not Allow Party Switchers to Run for Office

From Ballot Access News:
Florida HB 1355, passed by the House on April 21, is 157 pages long. Among the changes is a provision that does not permit political parties to nominate anyone for any partisan office (other than president or presidential elector), if that person had been a registered member of another political party at any time during the year before filing to run for office.
The bill makes no exception for new parties. Therefore, a new party, formed in an election year, would not be permitted to have any nominees who had been members of another party for 18 months before the election. This part of the bill, if signed into law, would almost certainly be held unconstitutional. Similar laws in Oklahoma and Nevada were invalidated, as applied to new parties. The Oklahoma case was Crussel v Oklahoma State Election Board, 497 F Supp 646 (1980); the Nevada case was Long v Swackhamer, 538 P 2d 587 (1975). If a law like this had been in effect in 1854, the Republican Party would have been severely handicapped, because a great deal of Republicans elected that year had been Whigs or Democrats or Free Soilers immediately before the Republican Party was formed.
Courts in New Mexico and Colorado have ruled that it is unconstitutional for a state to tell a party that it can’t nominate a non-member. The Colorado case was Colorado Democratic Party v Meyer (1988); the New Mexico case was Whitaker v Herrera (2011).
This prohibition is effectively a disciplinary and punitive probation period for party switchers, meant to discourage the practice to the benefit of the ruling parties.  It is not as uncommon as you might think.  In fact, it is rather similar to the law in Colorado denying ballot access to newly declared Independent candidates for office.  From the Denver Post, early last year:
Unaffiliated candidates running for public office in Colorado must declare their independence well in advance — more than a year — of an election. No other political party, whether major or minor, must follow the same stringent rule. It's an unfair situation.

Joelle Riddle, a La Plata County commissioner, switched her party registration from Democrat to independent in August 2009, intending to run for re-election in 2010. Late in December, state Rep. Kathleen Curry left the Democratic Party and registered as unaffiliated, also planning to run for re-election.

But under Colorado law, the only way the candidates could be placed on the Nov. 2, 2010, ballot was to declare their unaffiliated status by June 15, 2009, the last day the required petition could be filed with the Secretary of State. Now both will have to appear as write-in candidates in the general election.
Riddle has filed a lawsuit and Curry plans to introduce legislation to overturn the current state law . . .

Apr 22, 2011

FL: GOP-Sponsored Election Law Overhaul Seen as Attack on Fledgling Tea Pary, May be Unconstitutional

From Tampa Bay Online:
TAMPA - A little-noticed provision of the state Legislature's controversial elections bill would make it extremely difficult for a new political party to put a candidate on the state presidential ballot – a provision some say is aimed at keeping a tea party candidate off the ballot.

The section says that a new party seeking a presidential ballot placement must be recognized by the Federal Election Commission as a national party, or must collect voter petition signatures equal to 4 percent of voters in the state's last presidential election – more than 335,000.

They must include 4 percent in each of at least half the state's congressional districts, a tough job in Florida's oddly shaped, gerrymandered districts. Getting FEC recognition is also problematic, said Richard Winger of San Francisco, an expert on ballot access laws who argues for easier access to ballots for non-major party candidates.

He said the FEC has no objective rules for recognition, but won't recognize a new party until after it has already run candidates for president and congress in several states.
That's why the Reform Party didn't get FEC recognition until 1997, following Ross Perot's run in 1996 as its candidate.

Winger said the provision appears aimed at keeping a tea party candidate off the 2012 Florida ballot. Peg Dunmire, chairman of a Florida party that says it represents the tea party movement, agreed.
"This is part of the assault to keep choice from the public," she said. "There's a concerted effort by the two parties to keep it a two-party system."
From Ballot Access News:
The bill, if enacted, would violate the 11th circuit decision Bergland v Harris, 767 F.2d 1551 (1985), which suggested that Georgia’s former petition requirement of 2.5% (of the number of registered voters) for presidential candidates was probably unconstitutional. That decision is based on Anderson v Celebrezze, which said that states must have easier ballot access for president than for other office. The Florida bill, if enacted, would probably also violate the Florida Constitution, which says “The requirements for a candidate with no party affiliation or for a candidate of a minor party for placement of the candidate’s name on the ballot shall be no greater than the requirements for a candidate of the party having the largest number of registered voters.”

Apr 21, 2011

Pirate Party Recognized in at least Two States, Florida Pirate Prepares for 2012 Campaign

The Pirate Party is now an officially recognized political party in at least two states.  The Massachusetts Pirate Party was certified in February, and just last month another state chapter was officially recognized in Florida.  From the announcement at the party's website:
As Chairman of the Florida Pirate Party, I am very pleased to announce we have achieved an amazing feat: We are an officially recognized political party in the state of Florida. This is an amazing achievement, and is due in no small part to Vice Chairman Bradley Hall, Chris Sheats of the Pirate Party Washington, and Christopher Ochman, a tireless pirate supporter in Virginia.
However this is a small step in what is sure to be a long and tiring journey for us all. We created this party because as I type this, entertainment industry lobbyists, information technology firms and authoritarian regimes around the world are currently working to bring the flow of information and ideals under their control. They view unencumbered free communication as a threat to their profit margins, or their grasp on power.
The Florida Pirate Party, like the worldwide Pirate movement exists as the protectors of freedom of press and expression across any and all methods of communication. We stand against the efforts of the RIAA and MPAA to make governments their personal minions for censorship. We stand against the unconstitutional pursuit by the United States Department of Justice to seize web domains without just cause or due process.
We stand for openness in government. All our leaders must be held accountable. A democracy that keeps secrets from it’s citizens is no democracy at all.
We stand for the reform of intellectual property laws. Lifetime plus 70 years of copyright is ridiculous. We believe in expanding the public domain and creative commons.
We believe the future should be a place where someone can surf the internet without wondering who is watching, or use the phone and not wonder if someone is listening. We should not live in fear of our government or our internet service provider.
And the Florida Pirates are wasting no time beginning their ballot access drive.  The state party's chairman, Ryan Moffitt, has already announced his candidacy for a seat in the Florida House, and begun the petition campaign to appear on the ballot:
It is my pleasure to announce that I have begun my campaign to become the Florida state House Representative from District 86, and become the first Pirate Party candidate for political office in the United States.

Once the paperwork has been certified by the Division of Elections, I will be cleared to gather donations, and begin gathering voter petitions to get a spot on the ballot in the 2012 general election. . . .

Let this be the beginning of the end of the monopolist copyright industry. Let this be the beginning of the end of back room deals and secret operations. Let this be the beginning of the end of warrantless wiretapping and censorship.

With your help, we can bring the state of Florida into the new digital age, in a free and open manner run by the people, and for the people. We can end the old ideals, and the old guard who believe communication and creation should stay in the domain of ivory towers, marble halls or glass office buildings. The future belongs to us, the people.
Cross-posted from Poli-Tea.

Apr 19, 2011

FL: Independents Surge in Sarasota

From the Herald Tribune:
Seven of 10 new voters in Sarasota County are rejecting both the Republican and Democratic parties and signing up as independents or with minor political parties.  And the record surge of independents is not just happening here. Statewide, while the two major parties have lost more than 120,000 voters combined, independents and minor party registrations have grown by almost 120,000 since November 2008.

Elections supervisors in the region say they have never seen such a dramatic shift away from the major parties. While voters for years have been trending away from the major parties, Sarasota County Elections Supervisor Kathy Dent and her Manatee County counterpart, Bob Sweat, are convinced it has become more pronounced over the last two years, as voters become fed up with the political tone in Washington and in Tallahassee . . .

Feb 21, 2011

FL: Four Contenders for Libertarian Party State Chair

From The Examiner:
The race is heating up for Libertarian delegates to choose a new chair at the Libertarian Party of Florida's 2011 State Convention happening the weekend of April 30th in West Palm Beach, Florida. There are currently four contenders for the position, all of which will face off during a radio broadcast and Internet show debate Friday, March 25th on the Liberty Underground Show at 9AM.

Jan 29, 2011

FL: League of Women Voters Calls for Non-partisan Redistricting

From the Sun Sentinel, a statement from Fair Districts Now:
Within its first days in power, the new administration of Governor Rick Scott, through its Department of State, took extraordinary steps to thwart the will of the overwhelming majority of Florida voters who voted for redistricting reform in Florida.
On, November 2, 63% of Florida voters amended the Florida Constitution to include new non-partisan redistricting standards. When new laws affect voting as these do, the Voting Rights Act requires that the standards be reviewed and “pre-cleared” by the Justice Department (DOJ). It is the duty of the state to request DOJ pre-clearance. Governor Crist ordered that a formal request for pre-clearance be filed. The Florida Secretary of State’s office filed that request on December 10, 2010.
On January 7, 2011, as one of its first acts, the new administration of Governor Rick Scott, through its Department of State, in an apparent attempt to thwart the will of the voters, wrote to DOJ withdrawing the amendments from review. The Governor’s Secretary of State, Kurt Browning, was Chairman of Protect Your Vote -- the committee that spent millions of dollars opposing Amendments 5 and 6.
Dan Gelber, Counsel to FairDistricts Now, called the Secretary of State’s office to ask the reasons for the withdrawal and was told, “We cannot tell you why, only that we were directed to do so.” Another official indicated that he did not know if it would be resubmitted. Attached is a letter from FairDistricts Now to Secretary Browning, requesting that he re-submit the application for pre-clearance from the DOJ.

Jan 28, 2011

FL: Independents Outnumber Republicans, Gain on Democrats in Broward County,

From The Shark Tank:
In what amounts to an embarrassing piece of news for the Republican Party in Florida, the number of people in Broward County registered as Republicans now trails both Registered Democrats AND Registered Independents.  Broward Republicans now trail that highly organized political party, affectionately known as “Other” by close to 1000 votes.

Jan 12, 2011

Florida Tea Party Denounces Democratic-Republican Politics of Hate

A press release from the Florida Tea Party, sent via email:
Florida Tea Party Chairman Peg Dunmire denounced the shooting of United States Congresswoman Giffords and eighteen (18) other individuals in which six were killed, including a nine-year old girl today in Arizona.

"The 'politics of hate' that was so prevalent this past election cycle must be stopped," stated Dunmire. "We have seen it from many sources including the left and the right. It is unfortunate that many of the newer members of the tea party movement, that always talk about not having any organized leadership, may have indirectly influenced this deranged individual to take this action today. The attack on Congresswoman Giffords was a direct assault on the Constitution and the Republic," Dunmire stated.

"Even here in Florida we have seen self-proclaimed 'tea party leaders' like Everett Wilkinson become violent in public settings when he disrupted a news conference with Governor Rick Scott during the campaign. Antics like that give rise to more violence and should be removed from the body politic," Dunmire stated.

"I and many other leaders of the TEA Party have been subjected to the same types of written email threats and hate mail that were sent to Congresswoman Giffords recently and it's a truly frightening experience," Dunmire concluded.

Peg Dunmire is Chairman of the TEA Party of Florida 

www.FloridaTEAParty.US

Dec 18, 2010

FL: Libertarian Party Supports Ban of Red Light Cameras, Expansion of the Surveillance State

From the LP of Citrus County:
Through its Executive Committee, the Libertarian Party of Florida has voted to support future legislation to ban the use of red light cameras within the State of Florida.

The cameras have been popping up in various communities throughout the state as local government coffers dry up. Recent support for the cameras by local governments seems to correlate to the reduction of regular tax revenues.

The Libertarian Party of Florida has successfully lobbied the state legislature in past years to keep the state from approving their use and now seeks an all-out ban of the devices which create more problems then they solve. . . .

Nov 26, 2010

FL: Green Party Member Arrested for "Email Stunt" Terror Threat

From the Broward Palm Beach New Times:

The woman charged by the FBI with making a threat that led to the lockdown of more than 300 Broward County schools after hearing the words of right-wing talker Joyce Kaufman isn't a member of the Tea Party -- she's a member of the Green Party.

Ellisa Martinez was arrested yesterday for making an emailed threat and a phone call to Kaufman's radio station, 850-AM, on November 10. In the email, Martinez feigned agreement with the fiery arch-conservative rhetoric of Kaufman and Sarah Palin, but she's she's officially on the other side of the ledger. According to the Pasco County Supervisor of Elections Office, Martinez is a member of the Green Party, a progressive left-wing group focused on environmental issues.

The FBI says that after Martinez saw a tape on MSNBC of Kaufman at a July 3 Tea Party rally, she fired off a threatening email that led to a lockdown at all Broward County schools. During the speech, Kaufman made her now-infamous statement that "if ballots don't work, bullets will."

Nov 3, 2010

FL: Darcy Richardson Fires Last Salvo in Race for Gov, "Alex Sink Doesn't Get It"

From Uncovered Politics:

Florida Democratic gubernatorial candidate Alex Sink has spent much of the autumn campaign trying to distance herself from President Obama. She did so at her own peril, says Darcy G. Richardson, economist Farid Khavari’s running mate for lieutenant governor.

“The fact of the matter is that there never was a real Democrat in this race,” said Richardson while campaigning in Jacksonville on Friday. “From the beginning, Alex Sink has tried to portray herself as a moderate Democrat when, in fact, she supports much of the national Republican agenda.”

Richardson, 54, pointed to Sink’s support for extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, those earning $250,000 or more — a position that puts her at odds with the Obama Administration while exposing her deeply-held Republican ideology.

Contrary to Sink’s misguided and pernicious logic, if the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire for the nation’s wealthiest citizens, the vast majority of small businesses will be entirely unaffected, said Richardson, adding that, according to the IRS, less than 3 percent of tax returns reporting small-business income are filed by taxpayers in the top two income brackets — individuals earning $170,000 or families making $210,000 per year.

Eliminating the tax cuts will in no way prevent small businesses from creating the jobs that might lift our sagging economy, said Richardson. “Like Grover Norquist and other conservatives who shamelessly look out for the interests of the rich and well-connected, Alex Sink is propagating a myth.
“The vast majority of small businesses in Florida won‘t pay a penny more in federal taxes if the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy are eliminated,” said the independent candidate for lieutenant governor. “What they really need is credit and a state-owned bank willing and able to provide it.

“Alex Sink doesn’t get it,” he continued. “As Florida’s chief financial officer and a candidate for governor, one would think that she would have a better understanding of tax policy.”
Read the whole thing.  

Oct 13, 2010

Exclusive: Interview with Darcy Richardson, Independent Candidate for Lt. Governor of Florida, Part III

As noted in the introductory post of this series, this week TPID is publishing a lengthy interview with historian and long-time independent political activist Darcy Richardson, who is a candidate for Lt. Governor of Florida running on Farid Khavari's Independent gubernatorial ticket.  This post contains the final portion of the interview, in which Darcy discusses Farid Khavari's economic proposals for the state of Florida, the difficulties of overcoming mainstream media bias, and the general outlook for independent and third party politics this year and beyond.  See also Part I and Part II.    

TPID: Given that Khavari is an economist, it is no surprise to find that the centerpiece of his candidacy is a robust economic plan for the Sunshine State. The two key components of that plan are the foundation of a state bank and the implementation of a "zero-cost" economy. Would you briefly describe these two aspects of the economic proposal and explain how they are interrelated?
Richardson: As the first candidate for public office to seriously promote the idea of a state-owned bank since the Great Depression, Dr. Khavari's state-owned bank — relying on the commonly accepted practice of “fractional reserve banking” — would provide fixed-rate, fifteen-year mortgages at two percent and credit cards at six percent, while providing much-needed credit to Florida's struggling small and medium-sized businesses.

The Bank of the State of Florida would also provide attractive rates on car loans and other consumer borrowing while offering CD’s yielding a 6 percent return.  It could be the catalyst, says Khavari, for an “economic miracle” in Florida.

The bank’s profits would be used to reduce and eventually eliminate property taxes in Florida while helping to fund the state government, which faces a $5 to $6 billion budget shortfall in 2011, in much the same manner that the Bank of North Dakota regularly contributes to that state’s budget.

In the past decade, for example, the nation’s only state-owned bank plowed nearly $300 million into North Dakota’s treasury, enabling the state legislature to mandate property tax reductions.  Consequently, it’s one of the few states that doesn't find itself in a fiscal crisis. In 2009, North Dakota — one of the reddest states in the country — enjoyed a record $1.3 billion surplus.  It's not surprising, therefore, that North Dakota also boasts the lowest unemployment rate in the nation. Incredibly, the state’s jobless rate was only 3.7 percent in August.

I’ll frankly admit that I initially struggled to understand Khavari's concept of a zero-cost economy. The basic idea is to create wealth by freezing, then reducing and in some cases eliminating costs altogether so that individuals can save and invest for their retirements. It's designed to create what Dr. Khavari calls a "carefree economy."

The idea of a state bank is directly related. Imagine the potential savings, for example, if you had a two percent interest rate and could pay off your mortgage in ten to fifteen years instead of thirty years. Homeowners would save hundreds of thousands of dollars.  Of course, it'll never happen as long as the existing commercial banking industry — the ones responsible for our current economic plight — continues to have its way, but it could be a reality once state banks are established throughout the country.

A bold and imaginative thinker, Farid Khavari is the guy who can make it happen — at least here in Florida.

Fortunately, a number of other candidates around the country are also advocating the idea of state-owned banks, including Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero, the Democratic nominee for governor of Michigan. Several Green Party candidates, including New York’s Howie Hawkins and Rich Whitney of Illinois, are also vigorously championing the idea. 
TPID: Since the mainstream media often act as if they are the public relations arms of the Democratic and Republican parties, it can be quite difficult for third party and independent candidates to get a fair hearing for their ideas. Will you and/or Khavari be allowed to participate in any of the officially organized debates or candidate forums for this race? If not, will you be participating in any independently organized debates or forums?

Richardson: Farid has been invited to a couple of candidate forums, but for the most part invitations have been few and far between. In fact, we were excluded from Friday's Univision debate between Alex Sink and Rick Scott — an hour-long exchange in which the major-party candidates traded jabs and insults while saying little about how they might fix Florida's ailing economy.

Dr. Khavari also hasn't been invited to participate in a debate sponsored by Leadership Florida and the Florida Press Association to be held Oct. 20 at Nova Southeastern University in Davie, Florida, as well as another debate sponsored by CNN and the St. Petersburg Times on October 25.

The criteria for the October 20 debate sponsored by Leadership Florida and the Florida Press Association is an arbitrary and virtually insurmountable fifteen percent threshold (with a +/- 4% margin of error) in a recent Mason-Dixon Poll.

We're exploring our legal options, but I'm not holding out any hope that Dr. Khavari will be participating in any televised debates with his major-party opponents between now and Election Day. 
TPID: As a historian of the third party and independent political tradition in the United States, could you speak to the prospects of the third party and independent political movement in Florida or nationwide in 2010 and beyond?

Richardson:  Well, my favorite third-party candidates in this election cycle — a political potpourri that includes Dan La Botz in Ohio, Howie Hawkins in New York, Arizona's David Nolan and Christina Tobin, who's running for California Secretary of State, to name a few — probably won't be rewarded by the voters to the degree they clearly deserve. The same is true of the Green Party’s Rich Whitney in Illinois.

They're all legitimate — and attractive — third-party candidates with long personal histories of battling the increasingly corrupt duopoly, but most voters will inexcusably ignore their candidacies.

The strongest showings on Nov. 2, I suppose, will be posted by a handful of major-party personalities like Lincoln Chafee in Rhode Island and Florida's Charlie Crist, career politicians whose motivation for running as independents, in almost every instance, has more to do with self-preservation that any deep or lasting commitment to the idea of open politics in this country.  Regrettably, their sudden conversion to alternative politics is a matter of convenience more than anything else.

In conclusion, I'm not particularly optimistic about 2012, but if the Republicans, as expected, take both the House and Senate and a majority of governorships on Nov. 2nd, and are then widely viewed as the governing party — presiding over an ever-deepening depression while continuing to coddle the nation’s wealthiest citizens — then maybe, just maybe, the American people will finally have had enough and will seriously begin looking for an alternative. 
Hopefully, there'll still be something to salvage at that point. 
Thanks for taking the time to answer these questions Darcy!

FL-8: Tea Party, Independent and Whig Candidates Debate Alan Grayson, Republican Refuses to Participate in Debate with Independent and Third Party Challengers

From the Orlando Sentinel:
U.S. Rep. Alan Grayson, the firebrand Democrat fighting a conservative onslaught to boot him from office, sat next to an empty chair during the campaign's first debate Tuesday night. His Republican opponent, Dan Webster, didn't attend. . . .  Grayson shared the stage with Peg Dunmire of the Florida Tea Party; George Metcalfe, an independent; and Steven Gerritzen, a write-in candidate from the Whig Party.
Webster cited a scheduling conflict in not attending the debate sponsored by the Central Florida Urban League at the Citrus Bowl's Varsity Club. But his campaign has also made it clear that he won't debate unless the match-up includes only him and Grayson.
So Webster says he couldn't make it because of a scheduling conflict, but it turns out that even if there were no supposed conflict he still wouldn't have shown up because he thinks he is above an exchange of ideas with third party and independent candidates.  Professional political elitism at its worst.  

Oct 12, 2010

Exclusive: Interview with Darcy Richardson, Independent Candidate for Lt. Governor of Florida, Part II

As noted in the introductory post of this series, this week TPID is publishing a lengthy interview with historian and long-time independent political activist Darcy Richardson, who is a candidate for Lt. Governor of Florida running on Farid Khavari's Independent gubernatorial ticket.  In today's installment, Darcy discusses campaign strategy and Farid Khavari's remarkable biography.

TPID: Since Independent Bud Chiles withdrew from this race, support for an alternative to the Republican and Democratic candidates seems to have collapsed, judging from recent polls. What is your strategy as we head into the final weeks of the campaign season?
Richardson: Great question. Chiles should have stayed in the race, if only to chip away at both major parties. In the end, however, the pressure from the Democrats was simply too great.  Sadly, you're absolutely correct in observing that support for an alternative in Florida's gubernatorial contest appears to have completely collapsed. At this point — and let's be completely honest here — we're not even registering in the polls.  

Money, alas, has been a major problem.  Farid initially hoped to raise $200,000 or more from the Iranian-American community, but it hasn't materialized — at least not yet.  Consequently, we've only spent about $40,000 so far, making it somewhat difficult to get our message out.  That said, Farid hasn’t ruled out the idea of loaning his campaign $100,000-120,000 for our final push. Needless to say, it would be a huge investment.

As for myself, I plan to spend the final weeks of the campaign promoting the idea of a state-owned bank while trying to familiarize Floridians with Farid's remarkable life story. It's a really compelling — and moving — saga.

Khavari’s father was murdered by the radical Islamic regime of Ayatollah Khomeini in 1980 for refusing to renounce his Bahá'í faith, and his first wife died as the result of medical malpractice, but Farid doesn't harbor even the slightest trace of bitterness.

He's one of the most optimistic — and passionate — people I've ever encountered in politics.  His sincerity — his noble sense of purpose and the sheer conviction of his deeply-held beliefs — shines through every time he speaks. He's not a politician.

Farid recognizes that recession-ravaged Floridians are hurting, and they're hurting badly. He genuinely wants to help them. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Florida was one of only two states that experienced a spike in unemployment in August, reporting an official jobless rate of 11.7 percent, compared to 9.6 percent nationally. Unofficially, the unemployment rate — the U-6 rate —is much higher, well over twenty percent in several Florida counties.

Florida also has the second-highest foreclosure rate in the country, more than twice the national average. We experienced 544,000 foreclosures last year. Moreover, some 46 percent of all residential mortgages in Florida are currently “underwater” — and market values are expected to drop another thirty percent.

That's a lot of economic pain and suffering.

The hopelessly indebted classes in this country — the working poor and the dwindling middle-class — have suffered enough during this seemingly never-ending economic crisis while the most affluent Americans have seen their portfolios improve considerably.

According to Forbes magazine, the richest 400 Americans, sharing a combined wealth of $1.37 trillion, saw their wealth increase by 8 percent over last year, while a vast majority of Americans are struggling to make ends meet.

We need radical economic change — and somebody who’s willing to fight for America’s better self to make it happen. 
In the next post in the series, Darcy discusses Khavari's economic plan, including the idea of founding a state bank and that of a zero-cost economy. 

Oct 11, 2010

Exclusive: Interview with Darcy Richardson, Independent Candidate for Lt. Governor of Florida

Darcy Richardson is a veteran independent political activist, a historian of the third party and independent political tradition in the United States, and an Independent candidate for Lieutenant Governor of Florida, running on the gubernatorial ticket of economist and author Farid Khavari.  He is well known in third party and independent political circles for his multi-volume history of third party politics in the United States, entitled Others, as well as for his numerous articles on historical and contemporary political underdogs, many of which can be found at Uncovered Politics, a political news and opinion website he co-founded earlier this year.  Darcy was kind enough to provide Third Party and Independent Daily with a lengthy interview on his political career, the state of the campaign for governor in Florida, Khavari's economic plan and the current outlook for third party and independent politics in the United States.  The interview will be published here in a number of installments over the course of the week.  In the first part, he discusses the arc of his political career and, in the process, provides a short history of the Consumer Party. 

TPID: What made you decide to join Farid Khavari's independent gubernatorial ticket? Have you run for any elected offices before? What campaigns have you previously been involved with?
Richardson: I began following Dr. Khavari's campaign about fifteen months ago, shortly after he declared his candidacy for the Democratic nomination. I was initially attracted to his proposal for a state-owned bank modeled after the powerful Non-Partisan League’s state-owned bank in North Dakota, the 1919 brainchild of Arthur C. Townley, a cigar-chomping ex-Socialist Party organizer.

It wasn't until shortly after he dropped out of the Democratic primary and filed as an independent a few months ago that Farid asked me to be his running mate. Needless to say, I was deeply honored to be considered.

Not to date myself, but I made my political debut in 1979 when I ran for commissioner in Cheltenham Township, Pennsylvania, a suburb of Philadelphia. At the time, I was a Democratic precinct committeeman.

The following year, in 1980, I ran for Pennsylvania Auditor General on the Consumer Party ticket, an affiliate of the newly-formed Citizens Party. The Citizens Party nominated environmentalist Barry Commoner for President that year. I was 24 at the time.  Prior to that I had volunteered in Eugene McCarthy's 1976 independent presidential campaign and had managed my father's unsuccessful bid for the Democratic nomination for lieutenant-governor of Pennsylvania in 1978.

The Consumer Party was founded by Max Weiner and a few other activists in 1967 as the political arm of the non-profit Consumer Education & Protective Association (CEPA), one of the country's first consumer protection organizations.  A red-diaper baby and one of the nation's first consumer activists, Weiner founded CEPA a year earlier, shortly after Ralph Nader first burst onto the scene with his book, Unsafe at Any Speed.

For years, the raspy-voiced Weiner could be found shouting into his bullhorn on the east side of Philadelphia’s historic City Hall, railing for lower utility rates and mass transit fares and against shady business practices and political corruption. He was a folk hero to thousands of ordinary Philadelphians concerned with pocketbook issues.

In any case, I have quite a few fond memories of the 1980 campaign. I had been an alternate delegate to the Citizens Party's founding convention in Cleveland, Ohio, earlier that spring and also served as chairman of the Citizens Committee of Montgomery County, the party's national ballot access fundraising committee.

The Philadelphia-based Consumer Party sent a team of experienced petitioners headed by Lance Haver — the rabble-rousing and feisty Weiner’s eventual successor at CEPA — around the country to place the Citizens Party ticket on the ballot. A skilled community organizer, Lance had joined CEPA fresh out of college in 1978. He’s currently the city's Director of Consumer Affairs, a cabinet-level position created by Mayor John F. Street in 2003.

If memory serves me correctly, the party eventually qualified for a spot on the ballot in 29 states and the District of Columbia.  The Citizens Party attracted some outstanding individuals, among them author Studs Terkel, Maggie Kuhn of the Gray Panthers, a close ally of the Consumer Party, and Sidney Lens, a prolific writer, peace activist and labor organizer who ran for the U.S. Senate on the party's ticket in Illinois. Lens, who died in 1986, was a veteran of Dr. Benjamin Spock’s People’s Party in the early 1970s and was one of the leading lights on the American Left.

Failing to convince former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark to accept the party’s presidential nomination in 1984, the Citizens Party faded away shortly after Sonia Johnson’s ill-fated presidential candidacy that year — a race in which the ex-communicated Mormon finished in fifth place, about 6,700 votes behind reclusive perennial candidate Lyndon H. LaRouche.

The Consumer Party, on the other hand, was a fixture in Philadelphia politics for more than a quarter of a century. The party's high-water mark occurred in 1987 when party founder Max Weiner — I called him "Mighty Max" — polled 133,826 votes, or 21.6 percent, in a bid for an At-Large City Council seat. Everybody thought he would win.

Two years later, Max was leading his Democratic and Republican rivals in a bid for City Controller when his heart gave out two weeks before the election. He was leading in all the polls at the time of his death. His grieving widow, Besse — a remarkable woman in her own right — was substituted in his place and received nearly a quarter of the vote.

Altogether, I was active in the party for about a dozen years, running for the U.S. Senate as the party’s nominee in 1988 — the same year I managed the late Eugene McCarthy’s fourth bid for the presidency — and briefly mounting a campaign for Congress on the party's ticket in a special election in Philadelphia's 2nd congressional district in 1991.

I withdrew from the latter race in October of that year and gave my place on the ballot to Chaka Fattah, a young African-American State Senator who wanted to run on our ticket. Fattah, who eventually captured the seat when he defeated the incumbent congressman in the Democratic primary three years later, finished second in the special election, garnering 28 percent of the vote in a four-candidate field.

In addition to waging a handful of other local races, I also managed Dr. John Logue's campaign for the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate from Pennsylvania in 1982. The Yale-educated Logue, who finished second in a three-way primary that year, was the founder and director of Villanova University's Common Heritage Institute and published extensively on UN reform, law of the seas and international relations.

The white-haired Logue, who had previously taught at Fordham and Notre Dame, was an active World Federalist — he co-founded the Philadelphia chapter of the World Federalist Association — and believed strongly in global governance. Restructuring and strengthening the UN was the centerpiece of his frequent bids for the U.S. Senate.

I've remained politically active since relocating to Florida in 1993, running briefly for Duval County Supervisor of Elections as an independent in 2005 and managing Brian P. Moore's independent antiwar candidacy for the U.S. Senate in 2006.

In 2004, I vigorously defended Ralph Nader’s candidacy against the mean-spirited and obstructionist tactics of Democratic operatives trying to keep the longtime consumer activist off the ballot in as many states as possible, taking part in at least fifteen radio interviews across the country.

More recently, I also provided some behind-the-scenes assistance to Brian Moore's 2008 presidential campaign on the Socialist Party ticket and dabbled briefly in the Boston Tea Party, a Libertarian offshoot founded by the edgy and contemplative Tom Knapp of St. Louis in 2006.
Tune in tomorrow for the next portion of TPID's interview with Darcy Richardson.

Oct 8, 2010

FL-Gov: Democrats Begin to Break Toward Crist

From the Wall Street Journal:
Republican leaders in the Sunshine State are fretting that a deal may be in the works to get Democratic nominee Kendrick Meek out of the Florida Senate race in order to boost Charlie Crist's flagging chances of beating Republican Marco Rubio. Across the state, groups such as Palm Beach Democrats for Crist and Tampa Democrats for Crist are emerging.

Republican fears are further stoked by the almost universal acknowledgment that Mr. Meek has almost no chance to win. Statewide polling has his support in the teens and falling. His money coffers are all but dry. Democrats had hoped that when Mr. Crist abandoned the GOP for an independent run, it would split the Republican vote and propel Mr. Meek into the winner's circle. With four weeks to go, no one believes that now.

Oct 6, 2010

FL-8: Third Party Tea Party Candidate Challenges Two-Party Duopoly, Draws Ire of Republicans

From Town Hall:
Peg Dunmire is running for Congress under the name of a political organization called the TEA Party. Under this designation, Dunmire is winning six percent of the vote in Florida’s eighth Congressional district against Democrat Alan Grayson and Republican Daniel Webster, according to a recent poll.. . .

Dunmire, a 63-year old grandmother and consultant, is resentful at the suggestion that she might be dividing the base, or that she is the member of a subversive third party. . . .

You’re repeating exactly what the Republican mantra is: going to siphon off the votes, you’re going to be a spoiler,’” she said in an interview, when asked about the possibility of her splitting the vote. “That’s Republican jargon, that’s their view.”

“This two-party system is only about power — not about solving our country’s problems. It is power, power, power,” said Dunmire. “What I talk about is taking power away from the legislators and giving it back to the people. And that is absolutely not what the Republican Party wants to do.”