I simply don't buy any of the other solutions being proffered right now for the US's problems. The only way forward is to subvert the disastrously cut-throat rivalry between the two major parties that stems from the tendency of the US's political system to tilt to effective single-party rule . . .In his first post here at TPID, Dave provided an introduction to his ideas about how best to achieve that end, namely, by incorporating winner-doesn't-take-all elections into our existing US electoral system. He'll be posting under the handle DLW. Welcome aboard Dave!
Nov 17, 2010
New Contributor
As you might have noticed, there is another new contributor here at Third Party and Independent Daily, David L. Wetzell. Dave maintains the blog A New Kind of Third Party, where he writes in support of strategic election reform. In his most recent post there, he elaborates on the idea and concludes:
Labels:
administrative
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Thanks man, I think you culled out the only good quote from that monstrosity of a post...
I'm a less is more person in terms of election reform, because I believe we needed it centuries ago and that political jujitsu is the only real game in town. I think most third parties want a system with a level playing field across all parties so they could be a contender. I think that desire in our current system helps to hold back strategic election reform.
dlw
Post a Comment